Kodak BW400CN, Fantastic Misunderestimated Film

Many of the chromogenic (C41) process black and white films get mixed reactions on the web from working photographers, but my recent and continuing exploration of Kodak BW400CN has changed everything in my mind and in a very good way. To listen to the audio portion just click on the audioblog logo.

AudioBlog LogoTest Image: Kodak BW400CN exposed at box speed (400) and scanned on an Imacon Scanner. Minor contrast and density adjustment were applied in Photoshop CS3. Negative was made using a Leica M7 with a 28MM Elmarit F2.8 ASPH lens. Please note the file is larger than most here on FR so you can really see the stunning tonal range and detail. One additional note on the weather here in Vemont… it has been raining a lot and as such this image was made on an overcast day, thus the gray sky.

BW400CN_400

11 Responses

  1. Jon

    It does have a nice tonal range, that’s for sure.

    I’ve never really had anything against chromogenic B&W films per se — just for some reason it doesn’t quite feel right unless my bathroom stinks of fixer after a day of shooting. 😉

  2. Thanks! I will have to give this a try — last used tmax b&w cn a long time ago.

    Love the shadow detail, and the ability to use digital ice.

  3. Michael

    I’ve been playing with for a bit. Haven’t actually developed it as C-41. Been running them through the same chemicals as my other Kodak BW films. D76 68F 14 min. Has this 1950’s retro look that some of my mother’s old negatives have. I did try colored filters once but the film stopped winding 5 frames in, so no results.

    My negatives have a deep purple base, not orange. But they do scan wonderfully. I just need to get a new scanner. Stuck pixels or dust make this green/white line down the left hand side.

    You do have to let the film dry completely (12 hours here) before scanning or the image is very soft. Just out of the rinse they look almost blank, like something went wrong.

    I think I have a roll or two left. Maybe try the wide ASA rating. Even give it a run through the C-41 kit (just got!) and a duplicate roll in D76 to compare.

      1. Michael

        Finally got around to developing the 400CN as C-41 (at 400). Hard to scan because the mask is a deep brown color. Using a loop the image is almost black against a “100 W” spiral fluorescent.

        It is no longer available locally, even the camera store has its last box on the shelf….

  4. Steven, I have been shooting this film for a while. I take it to the lab & order Cd only, no prints The images on the Cd come back with a almost sepia tint to them. My last visit I told her about this & she said she would look into it. This last I just received is much better, but at close examination there is still a tinge of pink in the whites. I found that I can completely eliminate the pinkish tint by converting the photo to 8 or 16 bit greyscale in my editing software. I’m pretty new to editing prints & I was wondering what might be causing the sepia/pinkish tint to begin with? Also what editing, if any did you do to your print above. It looks great. Also if you look at the photo on my blog titled faith you will see what I mean. I left it unedited.
    Cheers, Greg

  5. Darrell Marquette

    I started using it because it is easier and cheaper to get processed than Tri-X or Plus-X. Costco seems to do a good job developing it. I agree that this film has very fine grain, especially for a 400 speed film.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s