<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Figital Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What is YOUR Usable EI - Exposure Index? by figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>figitalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Yes, 3 minutes A and 3 minutes B at 70 is fine but I find now that 75 F is best for most modern emulsions. 
Cheers-
Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 3 minutes A and 3 minutes B at 70 is fine but I find now that 75 F is best for most modern emulsions.<br />
Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is YOUR Usable EI - Exposure Index? by Eduardo Tillman</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduardo Tillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-432</guid>
		<description>I have never used Diafine before and I scan my 35mm film using the Nikon LS9000.I will be trying your procedure real soon. My question (to be sure) is (3+3 at 70F)mean 3 minutes in Part A and 3 minutes in Part B?  I don't want to assume the Obvious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never used Diafine before and I scan my 35mm film using the Nikon LS9000.I will be trying your procedure real soon. My question (to be sure) is (3+3 at 70F)mean 3 minutes in Part A and 3 minutes in Part B?  I don&#8217;t want to assume the Obvious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Processing Color Film in Diafine Developer by figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/08/26/processing-color-film-c-41-in-diafine-developer/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>figitalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=505#comment-429</guid>
		<description>I got an email from a reader who also tried this with old Kodachrome 64...the results were very nice! Have a great holiday and please post your results.
Cheers-
Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an email from a reader who also tried this with old Kodachrome 64&#8230;the results were very nice! Have a great holiday and please post your results.<br />
Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Processing Color Film in Diafine Developer by delfin</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/08/26/processing-color-film-c-41-in-diafine-developer/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>delfin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=505#comment-428</guid>
		<description>i'm about to try this out myself with some colour slide film, i'll get back to you about how that worked because there are very few references to work like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m about to try this out myself with some colour slide film, i&#8217;ll get back to you about how that worked because there are very few references to work like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 5 Digital Papers for 2008 by Elliot</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/12/17/top-5-digital-papers-for-2008/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=1079#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stephen, much appreciated. (Hey, your latest podcast is downloading right now!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephen, much appreciated. (Hey, your latest podcast is downloading right now!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 5 Digital Papers for 2008 by figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/12/17/top-5-digital-papers-for-2008/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>figitalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=1079#comment-424</guid>
		<description>The papers are:

Canson/ Arches Aquarelle Rag (Water Colour) 310gsm
Hahnemuhle Torchon, 285 gsm
Hahnemuhle William Turner 190 g/m2
Canson/ Arches B F K Rives 310gsm
Innova Smooth Cotton High White 315gsm

also try...

Hahnemuhle Photo Rag
Hahnemuhle Bamboo 190gsm

Cheers-
Stephen

I am testing more now and will post additional thoughts in 2009!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The papers are:</p>
<p>Canson/ Arches Aquarelle Rag (Water Colour) 310gsm<br />
Hahnemuhle Torchon, 285 gsm<br />
Hahnemuhle William Turner 190 g/m2<br />
Canson/ Arches B F K Rives 310gsm<br />
Innova Smooth Cotton High White 315gsm</p>
<p>also try&#8230;</p>
<p>Hahnemuhle Photo Rag<br />
Hahnemuhle Bamboo 190gsm</p>
<p>Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
<p>I am testing more now and will post additional thoughts in 2009!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diana Camera Film Loading Tip and Technique by figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/12/11/diana-camera-film-loading-tip-and-technique/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>figitalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=1069#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Kimberly- I assume you mean the 35mm back for the Diana F+...if so it just attaches and loads like standard 35mm film and it should come with pretty good instructions as mine did. If you mean to load 35mm film in the Diana F+ which is a 120mm film camera here is a link on how to do it without buying the back....

http://dianacamera.com/page/2

Just scroll down the page. Hope this helps.

Viva la Revolution-
Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimberly- I assume you mean the 35mm back for the Diana F+&#8230;if so it just attaches and loads like standard 35mm film and it should come with pretty good instructions as mine did. If you mean to load 35mm film in the Diana F+ which is a 120mm film camera here is a link on how to do it without buying the back&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://dianacamera.com/page/2" rel="nofollow">http://dianacamera.com/page/2</a></p>
<p>Just scroll down the page. Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Viva la Revolution-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diana Camera Film Loading Tip and Technique by Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/12/11/diana-camera-film-loading-tip-and-technique/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=1069#comment-421</guid>
		<description>if I bought the 35mm film from urban outfitters what is the right way to load it into the Diana F+ camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if I bought the 35mm film from urban outfitters what is the right way to load it into the Diana F+ camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 5 Digital Papers for 2008 by Elliot</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/12/17/top-5-digital-papers-for-2008/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=1079#comment-417</guid>
		<description>You really should outline the podcast topics in your show notes. I just listened to your podcast while walking around town and could only remember 2 of the brands you mentioned, so I came here to see the list.

No list!

And I really don't want to go back through the podcast, fast-forwarding and zipping back to find each mention, then hope I've got the spelling right on the papers....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really should outline the podcast topics in your show notes. I just listened to your podcast while walking around town and could only remember 2 of the brands you mentioned, so I came here to see the list.</p>
<p>No list!</p>
<p>And I really don&#8217;t want to go back through the podcast, fast-forwarding and zipping back to find each mention, then hope I&#8217;ve got the spelling right on the papers&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diana Camera Film Loading Tip and Technique by Lomography Diana+ Pinhole Test at Blur Dot Blog</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/12/11/diana-camera-film-loading-tip-and-technique/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Lomography Diana+ Pinhole Test at Blur Dot Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=1069#comment-414</guid>
		<description>[...] used to keep the film in place. It just doesn&#8217;t keep the roll tight enough. (See this Figital Revolution post  on how to get around [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] used to keep the film in place. It just doesn&#8217;t keep the roll tight enough. (See this Figital Revolution post  on how to get around [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
