<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak BW400CN and Fuji Acros Compared in Caffenol C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinhold</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reinhold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blue tint is normal for all Fomas. It doesn&#039;t affect scanning and wet printing. The Foma200 is discontinued because one of its key ingredients is not available at the moment. The Fomapan 100 in Caffenol-C is fantastic showing all the good aspects of this developer: fine grain, sharp, wide tonal range, good exposure latitude.

Best regards - Reinhold from Heidelberg/Germany]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blue tint is normal for all Fomas. It doesn&#8217;t affect scanning and wet printing. The Foma200 is discontinued because one of its key ingredients is not available at the moment. The Fomapan 100 in Caffenol-C is fantastic showing all the good aspects of this developer: fine grain, sharp, wide tonal range, good exposure latitude.</p>
<p>Best regards &#8211; Reinhold from Heidelberg/Germany</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, yes this is about the Fomapan Creative 200.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, yes this is about the Fomapan Creative 200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ki</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because you wrote blue fog, I guess this comment is about the Fomapan?
And thanks for the prompt reply!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you wrote blue fog, I guess this comment is about the Fomapan?<br />
And thanks for the prompt reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tested it yesterday and besides for the blue tint it looks fine at EI 200... the base has some crazy fog but in my Caffenol C processed it does work....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested it yesterday and besides for the blue tint it looks fine at EI 200&#8230; the base has some crazy fog but in my Caffenol C processed it does work&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ki</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s exactly the one I am using. And I got very poor results when I tried it in Caffenol. Maybe I am just doing something wrong.

By the way, mine is labelled FOMAPAN Creative 200, but according the tec specs from Foma it is the very same film: http://www.foma.cz/Upload/foma/prilohy/F_pan_200_en.pdf (look under &quot;packaging&quot; on page 1).

One Solution – Revolution

Ki]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly the one I am using. And I got very poor results when I tried it in Caffenol. Maybe I am just doing something wrong.</p>
<p>By the way, mine is labelled FOMAPAN Creative 200, but according the tec specs from Foma it is the very same film: <a href="http://www.foma.cz/Upload/foma/prilohy/F_pan_200_en.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.foma.cz/Upload/foma/prilohy/F_pan_200_en.pdf</a> (look under &#8220;packaging&#8221; on page 1).</p>
<p>One Solution – Revolution</p>
<p>Ki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That film is on my list to test...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That film is on my list to test&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since it looks like 120 BW400CN is disappearing, the other option would be Ilford XP2, which still comes in 120.  Would you be able to test that for this report?

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it looks like 120 BW400CN is disappearing, the other option would be Ilford XP2, which still comes in 120.  Would you be able to test that for this report?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have some fomapan Creative T200 which I planned on testing... is there a specific one? I am currently testing Ilford FP4+ and it is fantastic!
Viva la Revolution-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some fomapan Creative T200 which I planned on testing&#8230; is there a specific one? I am currently testing Ilford FP4+ and it is fantastic!<br />
Viva la Revolution-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ki</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, would you mind testing Fomapan as well? It is a really cheap film over here in Europe, you get a roll for about 1,50 Euros. And it would be quite interesting to see, how it performs.

Anyway thanks a lot for your testing-efforts. I am looking forward for your book.

regards

Ki]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, would you mind testing Fomapan as well? It is a really cheap film over here in Europe, you get a roll for about 1,50 Euros. And it would be quite interesting to see, how it performs.</p>
<p>Anyway thanks a lot for your testing-efforts. I am looking forward for your book.</p>
<p>regards</p>
<p>Ki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2010/02/03/kodak-bw400cn-and-fuji-acros-compared-in-caffenol-c/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=3537#comment-2290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am checking on the APUG rumor and hope to have some answers soon... I agree the Fuji is quite nice. I am now testing FP4+ as it has always been one of my favorite films with nice grain structure... more later.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am checking on the APUG rumor and hope to have some answers soon&#8230; I agree the Fuji is quite nice. I am now testing FP4+ as it has always been one of my favorite films with nice grain structure&#8230; more later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

