<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Print Surface Expectations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/09/07/print-surface-expectations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/09/07/print-surface-expectations/</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabella Crump</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/09/07/print-surface-expectations/#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabella Crump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2789#comment-2276</guid>
		<description>I found your website when I was searching for something else, but this page was one of the first sites listed in Yahoo, your site must be pretty popular!  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your website when I was searching for something else, but this page was one of the first sites listed in Yahoo, your site must be pretty popular!  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/09/07/print-surface-expectations/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>figitalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2789#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to see ink at a reasonable price but that is where all the profit is... most printers are sold at near cost... the ink in high end printers can cost your close to $8000 per gallon... cost to the company is less than $10 per gallon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see ink at a reasonable price but that is where all the profit is&#8230; most printers are sold at near cost&#8230; the ink in high end printers can cost your close to $8000 per gallon&#8230; cost to the company is less than $10 per gallon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/09/07/print-surface-expectations/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2789#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>Great point Stephen.
First of all I would like to tell you this is a great website / concept. After finding it yesterday, I was inspired to go out and shoot a couple rolls of HP5 through my Dad&#039;s Hasselblad and one through my Diana. After developing them a few minutes ago I realise how much of the process you are missing through digital photography, even with the DSLR&#039;s of today.
Print retouching is something I will have to try, but unfortunately, fewer and fewer people are adopting the one print to a photo technique, and will be inclined to simply print off a new photo instead of fixing existing ones with today&#039;s advancing printing technologies. 
The upside to this is that with these advances, it is easier, and cheaper mind you, for us to make adjustments and reprint a more satisfing image than it has been in the past.
Now if only they would drop the prices on printer ink...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Stephen.<br />
First of all I would like to tell you this is a great website / concept. After finding it yesterday, I was inspired to go out and shoot a couple rolls of HP5 through my Dad&#8217;s Hasselblad and one through my Diana. After developing them a few minutes ago I realise how much of the process you are missing through digital photography, even with the DSLR&#8217;s of today.<br />
Print retouching is something I will have to try, but unfortunately, fewer and fewer people are adopting the one print to a photo technique, and will be inclined to simply print off a new photo instead of fixing existing ones with today&#8217;s advancing printing technologies.<br />
The upside to this is that with these advances, it is easier, and cheaper mind you, for us to make adjustments and reprint a more satisfing image than it has been in the past.<br />
Now if only they would drop the prices on printer ink&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/09/07/print-surface-expectations/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>figitalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2789#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>All fixed... sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All fixed&#8230; sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/09/07/print-surface-expectations/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2789#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>Hey, Stephen, 

There is no audio file with this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Stephen, </p>
<p>There is no audio file with this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
