<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak Zi8 Review Part 3: Still Images and Final Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/08/27/kodak-zi8-review-part-3-still-images-and-final-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/08/27/kodak-zi8-review-part-3-still-images-and-final-thoughts/</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/08/27/kodak-zi8-review-part-3-still-images-and-final-thoughts/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bret]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2734#comment-1899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Review!
What size memory card/brand do you recommend for the Kodak Zi8?

Thanks,
 Bret]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Review!<br />
What size memory card/brand do you recommend for the Kodak Zi8?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
 Bret</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/08/27/kodak-zi8-review-part-3-still-images-and-final-thoughts/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2734#comment-1526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quality of the still images is good for a camera of this class but not great, best in good light... usable up to 5x7 or 8x10 prints... There is no flash.

Cheers-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of the still images is good for a camera of this class but not great, best in good light&#8230; usable up to 5&#215;7 or 8&#215;10 prints&#8230; There is no flash.</p>
<p>Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zak</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/08/27/kodak-zi8-review-part-3-still-images-and-final-thoughts/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2734#comment-1525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for this great review ..
im just having a little question ..it is concerning the quality of the still pictures since it is as important for me as shooting video ..
so may i have an idea about the 5MPX camera ?? the photos are resized so i cant judge well ..
also i want to ask if there is a flash or not ?

thanks again .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this great review ..<br />
im just having a little question ..it is concerning the quality of the still pictures since it is as important for me as shooting video ..<br />
so may i have an idea about the 5MPX camera ?? the photos are resized so i cant judge well ..<br />
also i want to ask if there is a flash or not ?</p>
<p>thanks again .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/08/27/kodak-zi8-review-part-3-still-images-and-final-thoughts/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2734#comment-1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the jitteriness is due to the lack of image stabilization on most of these cameras... the Zi8 has Electronic Image Stabilization which &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; helps and is very easy to see when compared to other models and makers. At 720 60fps it is really quite smooth... the 1080p is nice but it requires a smooth hand to pan just the right way but with a bit of experience it is easy. Overall this is the best pocket recorder I&#039;ve seen by a large amount.

Cheers-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the jitteriness is due to the lack of image stabilization on most of these cameras&#8230; the Zi8 has Electronic Image Stabilization which <em>really</em> helps and is very easy to see when compared to other models and makers. At 720 60fps it is really quite smooth&#8230; the 1080p is nice but it requires a smooth hand to pan just the right way but with a bit of experience it is easy. Overall this is the best pocket recorder I&#8217;ve seen by a large amount.</p>
<p>Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/08/27/kodak-zi8-review-part-3-still-images-and-final-thoughts/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2734#comment-1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When in comes to fps, is the jitteriness that noticeable and problematic at 30p? You are already doing 6fps better than motion pictures. Is it better in dark conditions? It sounds like the problem may be in the camera making the shutter speed faster than it should in bright light instead of adjusting the aperture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When in comes to fps, is the jitteriness that noticeable and problematic at 30p? You are already doing 6fps better than motion pictures. Is it better in dark conditions? It sounds like the problem may be in the camera making the shutter speed faster than it should in bright light instead of adjusting the aperture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

