<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Scanning Technique 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel Schepers</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcel Schepers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Stephen,

It is possible to tell something about how to deal with the orange mask when scanning color negatives as RGB positives? 

Best,
Marcel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stephen,</p>
<p>It is possible to tell something about how to deal with the orange mask when scanning color negatives as RGB positives? </p>
<p>Best,<br />
Marcel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d use as little as possible... just enough to correct for the loss in sharpness due to analog to digital conversion... if no sharpening is ok then go with that but I suspect you will need just a little.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d use as little as possible&#8230; just enough to correct for the loss in sharpness due to analog to digital conversion&#8230; if no sharpening is ok then go with that but I suspect you will need just a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Michael Brown</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Michael Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Stephen-

Thank you for that audio-blog most informative &amp; very educational. Thanks!

Question? What is your opinion on the setting &quot;UNSHARP MASK&quot; on my EPSON V750-PRO flat-bed scanner when scanning B&amp;W 35mm negs like Tri-X, T-Max, (v.2), or Kodak BW400CN/C-41?

Would you recommend to ENABLE, or DIS-ABLE this setting on my Scans?

Thanks again!

Cheers,

DM Brown]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stephen-</p>
<p>Thank you for that audio-blog most informative &amp; very educational. Thanks!</p>
<p>Question? What is your opinion on the setting &#8220;UNSHARP MASK&#8221; on my EPSON V750-PRO flat-bed scanner when scanning B&amp;W 35mm negs like Tri-X, T-Max, (v.2), or Kodak BW400CN/C-41?</p>
<p>Would you recommend to ENABLE, or DIS-ABLE this setting on my Scans?</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>DM Brown</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just tested it and it worked fine... just make sure you have Quick time installed.

Cheers-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tested it and it worked fine&#8230; just make sure you have Quick time installed.</p>
<p>Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am dying to hear this blog but after at least twenty attempts, it will not load/save.  any chance of uploading to itunes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am dying to hear this blog but after at least twenty attempts, it will not load/save.  any chance of uploading to itunes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your observation about the &quot;operator&quot; was spot on.  A lot of effort in learning what works best for you will go a long way to getting good scans.  And I think you provided a good foundation for people to start.

Thanks for putting forth the effort in getting information like this out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your observation about the &#8220;operator&#8221; was spot on.  A lot of effort in learning what works best for you will go a long way to getting good scans.  And I think you provided a good foundation for people to start.</p>
<p>Thanks for putting forth the effort in getting information like this out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cidereye</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cidereye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice audioblog indeed, agree with Jack re: Another 1 on processing scanned positives in PS, look forward to that. Many thanks yet again for your time &amp; efforts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice audioblog indeed, agree with Jack re: Another 1 on processing scanned positives in PS, look forward to that. Many thanks yet again for your time &amp; efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ahhh!! u missed out the link i&#039;m looking forward to see. the link about scanning oil mounts on a flatbed scanner. But it&#039;s okay, no rush. post it while you free k!

cheers!
Justin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh!! u missed out the link i&#8217;m looking forward to see. the link about scanning oil mounts on a flatbed scanner. But it&#8217;s okay, no rush. post it while you free k!</p>
<p>cheers!<br />
Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack-

1. I will put on the list a post on working on a scanned positive in PS.
2. I disagree that most scanning software is $#@!... most people just don&#039;t use it right or over use it and expect miracles with the push of a button.
3. If you follow my outline and open in PS and hit auto color, auto contrast and auto levels I think you would be amazed... this is not what I do nor suggest doing but the tech outlined does produce a scan that makes sense to PS in most cases.
4. Inverting the negative &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; be a &quot;big deal&quot; but the art of scanning in my opinion is seeing the whole negative (something which is based for a large part on experience) and capturing the full expressive range for use in PS- the inverting is just one part.
5. The Orange mask is a big issue with some films but not all films. I will outline my technique when I do the post I mentioned in #1.

Cheers-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack-</p>
<p>1. I will put on the list a post on working on a scanned positive in PS.<br />
2. I disagree that most scanning software is $#@!&#8230; most people just don&#8217;t use it right or over use it and expect miracles with the push of a button.<br />
3. If you follow my outline and open in PS and hit auto color, auto contrast and auto levels I think you would be amazed&#8230; this is not what I do nor suggest doing but the tech outlined does produce a scan that makes sense to PS in most cases.<br />
4. Inverting the negative <em>can</em> be a &#8220;big deal&#8221; but the art of scanning in my opinion is seeing the whole negative (something which is based for a large part on experience) and capturing the full expressive range for use in PS- the inverting is just one part.<br />
5. The Orange mask is a big issue with some films but not all films. I will outline my technique when I do the post I mentioned in #1.</p>
<p>Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/05/15/film-scanning-technique-101/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.com/?p=2298#comment-1013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I knew I missed something! Will post and update now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew I missed something! Will post and update now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

