<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super-Size Me! What&#8217;s Up with Big Digital SLRs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/07/14/super-size-me-big-digital-slr-canon-nikon-olympus-leica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/07/14/super-size-me-big-digital-slr-canon-nikon-olympus-leica/</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/07/14/super-size-me-big-digital-slr-canon-nikon-olympus-leica/#comment-2401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a subscribe by email link on the home page on the right side.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a subscribe by email link on the home page on the right side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenda Gallardo</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/07/14/super-size-me-big-digital-slr-canon-nikon-olympus-leica/#comment-2400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenda Gallardo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-2400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi..I am reading your page for a few days now is there any way to subscribe by email]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi..I am reading your page for a few days now is there any way to subscribe by email</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/07/14/super-size-me-big-digital-slr-canon-nikon-olympus-leica/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also agree.  I am an Olympus shooter and went to the Oly SLR system with the hopes of the promise of 4/3&#039;s living up to it&#039;s promise of a smaller form factor.  Well, as a part time pro I bought an E3 to replace my E1, it is quite large and not the easiest to travel with.  I like the thought of having a &quot;travel&quot; SLR, therefore the E420 fit the bill perfectly.  Not to mention the &quot;Y-Strap&quot; is the perfect companion.  Thanks for the thoughts, they are right on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree.  I am an Olympus shooter and went to the Oly SLR system with the hopes of the promise of 4/3&#8242;s living up to it&#8217;s promise of a smaller form factor.  Well, as a part time pro I bought an E3 to replace my E1, it is quite large and not the easiest to travel with.  I like the thought of having a &#8220;travel&#8221; SLR, therefore the E420 fit the bill perfectly.  Not to mention the &#8220;Y-Strap&#8221; is the perfect companion.  Thanks for the thoughts, they are right on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traciatim</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/07/14/super-size-me-big-digital-slr-canon-nikon-olympus-leica/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traciatim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, though I can&#039;t say that I&#039;m any better. I currently have an Olympus C5050Z which I purchased shortly after it came out. I have the small FL-20 flash because I used to take pictures while I was at Raves/Clubs and post them on a website and I found it useful to have the external flash for speed sake. 

I&#039;ve been contemplating replacing it with an Olympus E-520 and start out with the 14-54mm F2.8-3.5 lens, and then later on get a bigger zoom if I ever think I need one. I just can&#039;t seem to find a camera that&#039;s worth replacing my 5050 over though.

I print 4x6&#039;s normally, mostly my pics are screen viewed. I have full manual controls and never use the viewfinder, always the LCD or simply point and hope for the best. I can&#039;t seem to think of any reason other than I&#039;m greedy to get an E-520 over something mor practical like you&#039;re G9 suggestion, or some other full featured P/S.

Since I never liked taking pictures (I&#039;d say photography, but that&#039;s not what I do ;) ) before having the 5050 it&#039;s been a really great camera for learning on how to control my settings, and how to figure out which settings will take the best picture. I&#039;d really like the ability to pick a lense for the scenario too, butI doubt I&#039;d use much more than the single lens if I got the 14-54mm one mentioned above. If that&#039;s the case, why not just get a P/S with a built on lens that can take a telephoto accessory lens in a pinch? (Kind of like my C5050Z).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, though I can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m any better. I currently have an Olympus C5050Z which I purchased shortly after it came out. I have the small FL-20 flash because I used to take pictures while I was at Raves/Clubs and post them on a website and I found it useful to have the external flash for speed sake. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been contemplating replacing it with an Olympus E-520 and start out with the 14-54mm F2.8-3.5 lens, and then later on get a bigger zoom if I ever think I need one. I just can&#8217;t seem to find a camera that&#8217;s worth replacing my 5050 over though.</p>
<p>I print 4&#215;6&#8242;s normally, mostly my pics are screen viewed. I have full manual controls and never use the viewfinder, always the LCD or simply point and hope for the best. I can&#8217;t seem to think of any reason other than I&#8217;m greedy to get an E-520 over something mor practical like you&#8217;re G9 suggestion, or some other full featured P/S.</p>
<p>Since I never liked taking pictures (I&#8217;d say photography, but that&#8217;s not what I do <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) before having the 5050 it&#8217;s been a really great camera for learning on how to control my settings, and how to figure out which settings will take the best picture. I&#8217;d really like the ability to pick a lense for the scenario too, butI doubt I&#8217;d use much more than the single lens if I got the 14-54mm one mentioned above. If that&#8217;s the case, why not just get a P/S with a built on lens that can take a telephoto accessory lens in a pinch? (Kind of like my C5050Z).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

