<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is YOUR Usable EI &#8211; Exposure Index?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-2375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to say thanks for opening my eyes to both TX and Diafine. I am getting great results.

Cheers,
Sergey]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks for opening my eyes to both TX and Diafine. I am getting great results.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Sergey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty Mickan</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-1810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty Mickan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-1810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stephen, I&#039;ll watch the temp a bit closer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephen, I&#8217;ll watch the temp a bit closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-1807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it is true that the temp is not critical for Diafine... it is somewhat critical for your emulsion... I suggest around 70-75 F as the best... anything under 70F in my opinion is too cold. Also agitation is very important .... please watch my videos on the proper technique.

Cheers-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is true that the temp is not critical for Diafine&#8230; it is somewhat critical for your emulsion&#8230; I suggest around 70-75 F as the best&#8230; anything under 70F in my opinion is too cold. Also agitation is very important &#8230;. please watch my videos on the proper technique.</p>
<p>Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty Mickan</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty Mickan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-1806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen

I developed some diafine last night at 5 + 5.  I didn&#039;t check the temp, but it would have been around 25 degrees.  You state 70 degrees (F) in your post&#039;s above, but how critical is the temp?  I was not that pleased with the results, particularly for the outside mid afternoon shots.  they were very contrasty, and didn&#039;t look as nice as my last few Acris rolls that I have shot.  I can only put it donw to temp, but I didn&#039;t think that it was that critical with this developer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen</p>
<p>I developed some diafine last night at 5 + 5.  I didn&#8217;t check the temp, but it would have been around 25 degrees.  You state 70 degrees (F) in your post&#8217;s above, but how critical is the temp?  I was not that pleased with the results, particularly for the outside mid afternoon shots.  they were very contrasty, and didn&#8217;t look as nice as my last few Acris rolls that I have shot.  I can only put it donw to temp, but I didn&#8217;t think that it was that critical with this developer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, 3 minutes A and 3 minutes B at 70 is fine but I find now that 75 F is best for most modern emulsions. 
Cheers-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 3 minutes A and 3 minutes B at 70 is fine but I find now that 75 F is best for most modern emulsions.<br />
Cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduardo Tillman</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduardo Tillman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have never used Diafine before and I scan my 35mm film using the Nikon LS9000.I will be trying your procedure real soon. My question (to be sure) is (3+3 at 70F)mean 3 minutes in Part A and 3 minutes in Part B?  I don&#039;t want to assume the Obvious]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never used Diafine before and I scan my 35mm film using the Nikon LS9000.I will be trying your procedure real soon. My question (to be sure) is (3+3 at 70F)mean 3 minutes in Part A and 3 minutes in Part B?  I don&#8217;t want to assume the Obvious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[figitalrevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep your right on! Not all films have the usable EI range of TX but good film and Diafine are hard to beat.

cheers-
Stephen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep your right on! Not all films have the usable EI range of TX but good film and Diafine are hard to beat.</p>
<p>cheers-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;for example, I am working with a film like Kodak TX-just load a roll in the morning and start shooting and adjust your USABLE or “flexible” EI as the day and lighting change&quot;

Whoa, am I reading this right? I load 400TX in my camera. Then for early dawn shots I use the camera as if I had 800 or 1250 in it, during daylight I use the camera as if I had 400 in it, and in the home at night with available light I use the camera again as if it was 800 or 1250 once again? In other words, I have tremendous flexibility with shutter speed and aperture because the film/developer combo has such latitude?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;for example, I am working with a film like Kodak TX-just load a roll in the morning and start shooting and adjust your USABLE or “flexible” EI as the day and lighting change&#8221;</p>
<p>Whoa, am I reading this right? I load 400TX in my camera. Then for early dawn shots I use the camera as if I had 800 or 1250 in it, during daylight I use the camera as if I had 400 in it, and in the home at night with available light I use the camera again as if it was 800 or 1250 once again? In other words, I have tremendous flexibility with shutter speed and aperture because the film/developer combo has such latitude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/05/19/exposure-index-ei-latitude-film/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=360#comment-292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this info, I&#039;ve been experimenting with Diafine myself because I think it&#039;s easier to get consistent results. I have tried it with Fuji Neopan 1600 @ 800 but the results were not as compelling as TX400 @1600. I will be trying Acros asap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this info, I&#8217;ve been experimenting with Diafine myself because I think it&#8217;s easier to get consistent results. I have tried it with Fuji Neopan 1600 @ 800 but the results were not as compelling as TX400 @1600. I will be trying Acros asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

