<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharpness and Grain&#8230;Diafine Processed Films Compared!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/15/sharpness-and-graindiafine-processed-films-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/15/sharpness-and-graindiafine-processed-films-compared/</link>
	<description>A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elly</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/15/sharpness-and-graindiafine-processed-films-compared/#comment-3162</link>
		<dc:creator>Elly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=305#comment-3162</guid>
		<description>I will be including this to my listing of bookmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be including this to my listing of bookmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloaah</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/15/sharpness-and-graindiafine-processed-films-compared/#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloaah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=305#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Tri-X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Tri-X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rolo</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/15/sharpness-and-graindiafine-processed-films-compared/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>rolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=305#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Gotta say that considering it was shot at EI 1250, Tri-X looks awfully good.

Acros looks like it could use a contrast bump, but it&#039;s nice and smooth and grainless if you like that sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta say that considering it was shot at EI 1250, Tri-X looks awfully good.</p>
<p>Acros looks like it could use a contrast bump, but it&#8217;s nice and smooth and grainless if you like that sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figitalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/15/sharpness-and-graindiafine-processed-films-compared/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>figitalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=305#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Thanks! TMAX 400 (the new stuff) is great film that is hard to beat for sharpness or grain!

Viva la Revolution-
Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! TMAX 400 (the new stuff) is great film that is hard to beat for sharpness or grain!</p>
<p>Viva la Revolution-<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryon</title>
		<link>http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/15/sharpness-and-graindiafine-processed-films-compared/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=305#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Funny, the apparent grain in the tmax-400 seems to give it a sharper feel.  I assume it&#039;s the contrast of the grain that gives it that &quot;pop.&quot;  Great articles, but the way!  I&#039;m going to run out and buy some diafine ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, the apparent grain in the tmax-400 seems to give it a sharper feel.  I assume it&#8217;s the contrast of the grain that gives it that &#8220;pop.&#8221;  Great articles, but the way!  I&#8217;m going to run out and buy some diafine ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
