Comments on: Fuji Acros 100 in Diafine Developer http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/04/fuji-acros-100-in-diafine-developer/ A Maverick Manifesto for the 21st Century Photograher Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:34:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: mark young http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/04/fuji-acros-100-in-diafine-developer/#comment-4263 Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:47:44 +0000 http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-4263 i am also developing acros in diafine. Seem to be getting an extreme iso bump, beyond 200. Setting iso to 400 and even then putting on quite a bit neutral density. My main question is…or observation….BW film sure ain’t like digital!. Scans on my v500 are fairly soft, worse in soft light. I can bring them to a nice sharpness with careful sharpening, but pulling up quite a bit of grain, as I’m attempting to pull up as much sharpness as possible. Must realize BW scanned is not going to look like digital. I see your image here, makes me feel better, not that razor sharp imagery of digital, and probably not intended to look like that either. Of course your scanner is better, but i am scanning at 3200 or 6400 48 bit, etc, doing the most i can, thanks for your help.

]]> By: figitalrevolution http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/04/fuji-acros-100-in-diafine-developer/#comment-695 Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:18:15 +0000 http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-695 Acros and Diafine are a great combo for scanning… I think your really going to love it!

Cheers-
Stephen

]]> By: Carlo Ch http://figitalrevolution.com/2008/04/04/fuji-acros-100-in-diafine-developer/#comment-691 Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:26:13 +0000 http://figitalrevolution.wordpress.com/?p=283#comment-691 After seeing your results I’m going to try Diafine too. I’m absolutely in love with Acros, which I stand develop in Rodinal 1:100. I always thought that stand dev in Rodinal was a good solution for film to be scanned. I’m quite curious to compare it to Diafine.

]]>