Print Surface Resolution…A Proposal by Stephen Schaub
December 7, 2007 by figitalrevolution
Posted in AudioBlogs, Print Surface Resolution, Test Targets | Tagged canson, crane paper, digital printing, dpi, ergosoft, indian hill imageworks, ink jet resolution, innova paper, podcast, Printer Resolution, raster, resolving power of digital printing, schaub, screening technology, Test Targets | 2 Comments
2 Responses
Leave a Reply
The Figital Revolution – THE BOOK – Buy It Now!!
Propaganda Supplies
Target Pratice!!
Figital Revolution on Flickr!Twitter Updates
- Just received my Pocket Spot Meter by Metered Light... review soon on Figital Revolution: http://bit.ly/7803BO 7 hours ago
- Part one of The Evolution of a Project now on Figital Revolution: http://wp.me/p9nT0-O2 1 day ago
- Managed second day of shooting in NYC Central Park with the Cuboid... hope to start processing the film tomorrow as I am now back in VT... 3 days ago
Contact US!
Need printing services? Do you have questions regarding just about anything photographic? Do you want to have the Figital Revolution visit your town or camera club...Contact US!Stephen Schaub
Leader, Figital Revolution- Copyright © 2006 - Present Stephen M. Schaub, All Rights Reserved.
-
Figital Revolution Visits Since 12.1.07
- 358,261 HITS!
Meta







The basic idea of testing for print surface resolution is a good one, but involves a daunting number of variables. What is needed is something like an ISO standard that would set common ground rules — usable by manufacturers and independent testers for purposes of comparison (like film speed standards) — *and* a digital-age Ansel Adams to popularize a set of simple procedures for actual photographers to discipline and regularize the use of their personal combinations of equipment and materials (as we do for film speed and development). At the moment we seem to have neither ISO-like industry standards nor Zone-System-like techniques for learning and using “the craft”.
There is software like Chromix Pro which allows you to look into an icc profile and map it’s specific qualities but this is just numbers and not prints. The USAF test target is good but lacks in some very important areas. The test target I have for download here on the Figital Revolution (it is under Target Pratice) was inspired by the DIMA targets that I see every year…most of which suck. I wanted to make a target that was visual so the average user without $$$ worth of software could eval their profiles and paper combo and figure out just how good their system is and better understand its limitations and strengths and in doing so touch on PSR. At Indian Hill Imageworks I run an exhaustive series of tests and use both mathmatical and visual tests to determine icc quality and PSR (I use a 30x microscope for final dot inspection)….but this is out of the range of most users. My current target is something like an eye test…easy to take, easy to understand and eval and of course easy to cheat on.
Best-
Stephen